Comments that are not specific to a certain post should go here, for the month of April 2014. Contributions should relate to the cause and goals of this organization and please, keep it courteous and civil.
Related posts
-
Senators call for audit of TSA’s facial recognition tech as use expands in airports | The Record from Recorded Future News
Source: therecord.media 11/22/24 A bipartisan group of 12 senators on Wednesday sent the Department of Homeland... -
-
SORNA Case Advances in Federal Court; PLF Files Motion for Summary Judgment
The Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) filed a motion for summary judgment on November 18 in its...
what I want to know is a man who murdered his wife as a quote mercy killing was charged with 2nd degree murder but he was home with a ankle monitor but yet they refused to give me an ankle monitor, when my case involves nobody I thought I was helping someone who thought they were gay but as you all know it don’t matter what you did if they charge you with any kind of sex charge your gonna lose, but I guess murder is not as bad as a sex crime, this just amazes me.
Hey None, I guess next thing you know they will arrest somebody for standing across from the bank and claim he was going to rob it just because where he was standing, or arrest someone who is stearing at you to long because he was going to murder you, then next thing you know they will come by and grab people from there homes like Germany and put them in prison camps, which they already have plus they also have coffins but they will deny it of course, if you think humans can’t do things like this then you better read your history books it’s happened over and over and over again but no one learns, May God Bless
Not sure if this should be post in public
but this is posted in sosen some where
next time we go in and register
can we give them this notice?
I hereby invoke and refuse to waive all the following rights and privileges afforded to me by the US constitution.
I invoke and refuse to waive my 5th amendment right – my right to remain silent – do not ask me any questions.
I invoke and refuse to waive my 6th amendment right to an attorney of my choice. Do not ask me any question without my attorney present.
I invoke and refuse to waive all privileges and rights pursuant to the case Miranda vs Arizona. Do not ask me any question or make any comment to me about this decision.
I invoke and refuse to waive my 4th amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. I do not consent to any search or seizure of myself, my home, or of any property in my possession. Do not ask me about my ownership interests in any property. I do not consent to this contact with you.
If I am not presently under arrest or under investigatory detention, please allow me to leave.
Any statement I made or alleged consent I give in response to your questions is hereby made under protest and made under duress and is made in submission to your claim of lawful authority to force me to supply you with this information.
I think it only a matter of time before all attorney client privileges cease to exist.
“It doesn’t matter what you’re accused of– theft. treason. triple homicide. With very limited exceptions, an attorney cannot be compelled to testify against a client, nor can their communications be subpoenaed for evidence.”
“Yet in a United States Tax Court decision announced on Wednesday, the court dismissed attorney client privilege, stating that:”
“When a person puts into issue his subjective intent in deciding how to comply with the law, he may forfeit the privilege afforded attorney-client communications.”
“In other words, if a person works with legal counsel within the confines of the tax code to legitimately minimize the amount of taxes owed, that communication is no longer protected by attorney-client privilege.”
“Furthermore, the ruling states that if the individuals do not submit attorney-client documentation as required, then the court would prohibit them from introducing any evidence to demonstrate their innocence.”
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article38286.htm
I would like to show up at ALL RSO FEDERAL HEARING to show my support for Janice and Frank. is there a way we can know when the hearing date is so we can make plan ?
This is the kind of attitude that get’s stuff started This Guy Believes & I Quote,” I have that right because my rights in the community are more important than his rights in the community.”???Really? & this is hitting Australia Now & I have friends There…http://tvnz.co.nz/sunday-news/naming-convicted-sex-offenders-5941708
This Crap is goin’ world wide
& Congrat’s to Janice & Frank I support & Believe;-)We shall Over Come,,,Someday. But Janice You Are Doin’ a Great Job of Keeping Them in line & Thank You Mam.
I’m wanting to get some feedback on this and find out if any others are dealing with this. My wife recently visited the Megan’s Law website and saw it has my risk assessment at 3 and says it is based on the Static-99 assessment from 2010. Here’s the problem: I have never taken the Static-99 for the state of California, and the assessment I did was in 2009 and I was told by one of the psychologists at the parole office that their assessment showed me as “very low risk,” and that’s after a year of being forced to be homeless and out of work. Even the psychologist who was at the time in charge of all of the counseling groups at that parole office said before our entire group that I was very low risk and shouldn’t even be there! I’ve only taken the Static-99 twice, both times in 2007, and both times it had me at a 0.
Is there anyone else out there who has blatantly false risk information on their Megan’s Law profile like this?
Also, I’d like to get some input from others as to whether anyone thinks this is a viable suit against the state to get them to stop putting blatantly incorrect information on registrants’ profiles. It’s bad enough they have our photos and info on the site, but when the info is blatantly falsified to make us look worse than we really are.
So my annual is fast approaching.. I hope like all my past visits (10 years) that it’ll be quick, streamline, and awkward like having a doctor sticking his finger up your butt….
Can anyone help me clarify something> I have an 1987 conviction (adult victim), paroled in 94 and released from parole in ’97. Apart from annual registration, I have had no contact with LE.
While I know that I am not subject to Jessica’s Law residency restrictions, I am a little hazy in another areas:
What are the rules regarding my presence on school property and, what defines a “school?” Can I take my kid to gymnastics classes at a dedicated gymnastics (karate, ballet, etc.) and wait with the other parents?
If my church has a school on its grounds, can I attend the church?
What about a bible study in a multi-purpose building on the same property?
As hurtful as it is to both me and my kids, I have opted to not attend any of their school functions lest I be outed and my kids ostracized. I make it up to them by taking them and participating in extracurricular activities, but I want to make sure I am well in compliance.
Thanks for your help in this matter! 🙂
That looks like and quacks like a duck…its a duck……parole conditions have an end date usually of three years…….NOT alifetime ….injustice must be challenged that extends parole//////////punishment.
I was doing a little reminiscing tonight of these loony presence restrictions and looked up the Lake Forest Battle between Mayor Kathryn McCullough VS. Tony Rackauckas. That was when the Mayor was asking Tony to indemnify the city against a pending Federal Lawsuit. Eric Knight posted a transcript of the heated debate here back on Dec. 5, 2012. and Janice had this little premonition:
———————————————————————————-
Janice Bellucci
December 5, 2012 at 5:50 pm
You are very welcome! I was proud to stand with 7 others in support of the city’s repeal of this ordinance. It is indeed a night to remember and I believe the beginning of the end of the Orange County ordinances.
———————————————————————————–
Thank you very much for all you do Janice and Staff, for taking up this cause that is very important to many families throughout the state and nation. It gives us all hope for a better future. I will always smile thinking about the Mayor putting Tony in his place.